学术交流

• 作者：王瀚葳     
• 单位：

  中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院，武汉
  

• 关键词：讯问；自愿性；真实性；审查方式
• Interrogation; Voluntariness; Authenticity; Review methods
• 摘要：认罪认罚从宽制度的一切前提在于认罪，而认罪的实体和程序双重属性以及影响认罪的多方因素决定了认罪过程的艰难复杂性。作为与认罪最先接触的刑事诉讼程序——侦查讯问，最先接触犯罪嫌疑人并听取其辩解或供述，如果在此阶段将犯罪嫌疑人认罪的供述作为合法有效的证据予以固定，不仅能尽快尽早发现案件事实真相，减少甚至挽回犯罪危害后果，同时真实的认罪供述也将有助于认罪认罚从宽制度的顺利展开，以达到节约司法资源、实现犯罪治理、化解社会矛盾的目的。本文以2021至2022年的裁判文书为分析样本，从“认罪”的基础结构框架、“认罪”自愿性的影响因素、对“认罪”的审查方式三方面进行论述，力求在前辈们研究的基础上进行补充完善，从而进一步推动我国认罪认罚从宽制度的发展。
• All the preconditions of the system of confession, confession and leniency of punishment lie in confession, and the dual attributes of the entity and procedure of confession and the multiple factors that affect the confession determine the difficult complexity of the confession process. As the first criminal procedure to contact with the guilty plea - investigation and interrogation, the first contact with the suspect and listen to his plea or confession. If the confession of the suspect is fixed as legal and effective evidence at this stage, not only will the truth of the case be found as soon as possible, reduce or even recover the consequences of criminal harm, but also the true confession will help the smooth implementation of the leniency system of guilty plea and punishment, in order to save judicial resources, achieve crime management and resolve social conflicts. Taking the judicial documents from 2021 to 2022 as the analysis sample, this paper discusses the basic structure framework of “confession”, the influencing factors of “confession” voluntariness, and the review method of “confession”, and strives to supplement and improve on the basis of the research of predecessors, so as to further promote the development of the leniency system of confession and punishment in China.
• DOI：https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0302008
• 引用：

  王瀚葳．从宽制度下嫌疑人认罪自愿性问题研究——以2021—2022年裁判文书为分析样本［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2022，3（2）：57-65．

♦查看全文